🔗 Share this article Russia Seeks Substantial Sum in Compensation against Clearing House over Frozen Funds The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a clear response from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine. The Legal Claim Based on accounts in local state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim. EU leaders will determine later this week on a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial needs. The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves. A Clash Over Legality European Union officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine. The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, wrote on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan. Wider Implications With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States." The clearing house refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Legal Hurdles Ahead While judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm. European Safeguards EU officials said they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also designing safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation." How the Funding Would Work According to the complex scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would only be required to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year conflict. Alternative Proposals Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition. Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful message that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."